Mixed Motives Mix-Up: The Ninth Circuit Evades the Direct Evidence Requirement in Disparate Treatment Cases

Authors

Brian W. McKay

First Page

503

Last Page

528

Recommended Citation

Brian W. McKay, Mixed Motives Mix-Up: The Ninth Circuit Evades the Direct Evidence Requirement in Disparate Treatment Cases, 38 Tulsa L. Rev. 503 (2003).

Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr/vol38/iss3/4